Jockey Men's Classic Low Rise Brief - 3 Pack

These Jockeys are the only briefs I've found that have adequate material across the bottom. So many other briefs skimp on the material, leaving gaps where the tops of my legs hit my body. I don't want a thong, I want full support.

Low quality cotton used to make brief. Scratching feeling caused by waste band and brief

My husband always wears this style. I think he looks great!

I think they forgot what Classic is! I used to Love my Classic Jockey’s. But apparently they had to “Fix” what wasn’t broken! (They have introduced a bunch of New Colors! Black, White and Gray…) However, there is Nothing Classic left in these! I thought I ordered the Low Rise, but yet, these are closer to a Mid Rise, borderline Full Rise?! And the Sizing is more like a Chinese, so called, American Sizing! I’ve been wearing 28’s or 29’s in Jeans (29’s if I’m tucking a shirt in!) according to Jockey, that should be a Small. I Agree, but yet, They Are Tight!!! So just to Recap, their Large used to fit like a Medium and now they’re Small’s fit like an Extra Small… So to understand Me better, I will be keeping these. Why? Because I’ll probably be losing more weight, unintentionally. Again. Plus, I’d be willing to bet, if I trade them in for mediums, they probably won’t fit either… And to understand me better still, I generally prefer Bikini Briefs. And since I am so Shy and Timid, I prefer to wear “Normal” Briefs whenever I go to a Doctor (unless of course, I Know that there’s NO WAY for me to drop my pants at the dr’s office!

They are very comfortable. My husband said he loves them, the only thing I’m upset about with Jockey is that most of the men’s briefs are no fly my husband wants the ones with a fly so I have to always buy the same ones. I wish they would change that

Good snug and supportive fit. Easy to use flap access

What happened to just Jockey Classic briefs? Now it's full rise (comes up too far) or low rise (sizing isn't what it should be) same size as the full rise and they're too tight and don't come any larger.

Great size and quality like how they fit and good fabric

I have a 35" waist so I ordered 36. They were way too small so I returned them and ordered 38. Even those are too small but I kept them because I don't want to be a pain in the, uh, butt.

[This review was collected as part of a promotion.] These are just your basic comfortable standard low rise briefs you'd expect from Jockey. I have worn these for years and got some new ones. Fit is still the same. Comfort is still the same. You can't go wrong for these. All day comfort.

The same as above. At times need additional support when engaged in sports and other physical activities. Been buying Jockey products for decades now!

I have been wearing jockeys all my life. There is no other underwear that can even come close to be as comfortable and they last forever.

I am a size 32-33. Medium briefs fit fine. I’ve worn briefs for years. However I have found the “fly” barely functional.

[This review was collected as part of a promotion.] I bought this about 5 years ago and my husband really loves it.

I have been purchasing these since mid-2010s and must say they feel comfortable and the elastic on these has ensured a very well fit both in the leg and waist. The white briefs in particular don't seem to fade out as much when washed compared to other brands I have previously purchased and worn. All in all I can say these are the best briefs I have purchased up to this point.

The 3 PK that I received did not fit, they were too tight and did not fit .

Nice fit, but I should have ordered no openings in front

Shrunk a lot after washing even though I followed the instructions on how to wash them. They are at LEAST a size smaller now.

The waistband is thinner and tighter making them very uncomfortable.

While I enjoy the colors and price point, the briefs run very small. I'm a 33 waist, so I bought a 34. Out of the package they were already tight and I'm sure will shrink even further after the wash. Sizing up to a 36 seems excessive and I don't think that's a valid option either. Also, what year is it? Why are will still sewing scratchy, rough, and itchy tags into the back of underwear? A vast majority of men's underwear brands have done away with this, but apparently not Jockey.