The JFK Assassination Chokeholds - by James DiEugenio & Paul Bleau & Matt Crumpton

About the Book

"In JFK Assassination Chokeholds, readers will find the all-defining and up to date evidence that would have compelled any jury to conclude that Oswald would not have been found guilty beyond reasonable doubt and that there is 'clear and convincing evidence' of both a conspiracy and obstruction of justice. The approach taken by the authors in this anthology, three of whom are attorneys complemented by two of the leading authorities in the field, focuses on sixty years of revelations that have been inescapably proven. There is no way around these matters, making them argumentative 'chokeholds.' The next time a historian, teacher, author or Warren Commission backer pushes the lone-nut assassin scenario, the reader will be able to counter with troubling questions: Why was Oswald impersonated? Why did Ruby receive assistance in murdering Oswald? Why does an overwhelming number of investigation insiders not believe the Warren Commission conclusions? How can one explain the scandalous shenanigans around JFK's brain? And many other inexplicable facts that are a matter of record. On November 22, 1963, the world took a turn for the worse. JFK and everything he stood for was cruelly taken away from us. Hopefully the truth can help pave the way for a new direction"--

Book Synopsis

In JFK Assassination Chokeholds, readers will find up to date evidence that would have compelled any jury to conclude that Oswald was not guilty beyond reasonable doubt, and that there is clear and convincing evidence of both a conspiracy and obstruction of justice to cover it up.

The approach taken by the contributors in this anthology, three of whom are attorneys complemented by two of the leading authorities in the field, focuses on sixty years of revelations that have been inescapably proven. There is no way around these matters, making them argumentative "chokeholds."

The next time a historian, teacher, author or Warren Commission backer pushes the lone-nut assassin scenario, the reader will be able to counter with troubling questions, such as: Why was Oswald impersonated? Why did Ruby receive assistance in murdering Oswald? Why do an overwhelming number of investigation insiders not believe the Warren Commission conclusions? How can one explain the scandalous shenanigans around JFK's brain and the chain of custody for CE 399? And many other inexplicable facts that are a matter of record.

On November 22, 1963, the world took a turn for the worse. JFK and everything he stood for was cruelly taken away from us. Hopefully the truth can help pave the way for a new direction.

Review Quotes

"Fascinating glimpse into the accumulating knowledge of this crime. And why Presidents Trump and Biden both backed away from full disclosure of the JFK Files. This book goes beyond all reasonable doubt to prove that Oswald, given a real trial, would have been acquitted." - Oliver Stone, 3-time Academy Award Winning Director

"Long-time assassination researchers Jim DiEugenio and Paul Bleau, along with attorneys Matt Crumpton, Andrew Iler and Mark Adamczyk, are to be commended for the tremendous public service they've performed with the publication of their new book, The JFK Assassination Chokeholds. What is a "chokehold," you might ask? It is a body of evidence that allows one to draw an indisputable conclusion - in this case, that JFK's assassination was the result of a conspiracy. And according to the authors, there are 10 such chokeholds, each of which receives a chapter-length treatment. If anyone can come away from a reading of the current state of our knowledge about the so-called "single bullet" or the fatal head shoot without feeling the constricting nature of well-applied, incriminating proof, he or she is likely already intellectually moribund." - Cyril H. Wecht, M.D., J.D

"A valuable handbook by five authors which clearly proves its principal thesis of conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt. But, by no means are their essays in total agreement. The book's value stems from the use of a "chokehold" methodology-a shorter term for the criterion of multiple independent attestation of sources. The scope of this volume makes it a great accessory-not so much for historians or researchers-but rather for the desks of authors who undertake historical research."-Dr. John M. Newman, Adjunct Professor of Political Science

James Madison University, Major, US Army Intelligence, Retired